#AI ChatGPT Grok: How much credibility should one give to official economic data?
I asked:
"With respect to economic data, e.g., inflation rate, GDP growth and unemployment rate, given by official entities e.g., a Bureau of Labor Statistics, political considerations set aside, how much credibility should one give to that those figures accurately reflect the reality?"
ChatGPT answered:
Economic data such as the inflation rate, GDP growth, and unemployment rate, when published by official entities like the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) or the Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA), generally deserve a high level of credibility—but not blind trust. Here's why:
Why they are broadly credible:
1. Transparent methodology: Agencies like the BLS and BEA publicly disclose how data is collected and processed. Methodologies are subject to academic scrutiny.
2. Professional staff: These agencies are staffed by career statisticians and economists with technical expertise, not political appointees.
3. Consistency over time: The data is collected using well-established procedures that allow for comparisons across time and countries.
4. Third-party validation: Independent researchers, journalists, and global institutions (e.g., IMF, World Bank) constantly review and critique the data.
But here are the caveats:
1. Statistical limitations: Reality is messier than averages. Unemployment figures, for example, exclude discouraged workers, and inflation may not reflect personal cost-of-living experiences.
2. Revisions: Initial GDP and job figures are often revised—sometimes substantially—based on better or fuller data.
3. Assumptions and models: Seasonal adjustments, imputations, and hedonic adjustments (in inflation) are necessary, but they can also obscure intuitive reality.
4. Political pressure: While rare in advanced economies, pressure to "frame" narratives exists. However, data tampering in the U.S. remains unlikely due to strong institutional norms and watchdogs.
Bottom line:
Treat official statistics as broadly reliable indicators of trends and magnitudes, but supplement them with independent analysis and understand the definitions and limitations behind each number. Statistics are a map, not the territory.
I said: Thanks!
It replied: You're very welcome! If you'd ever like to dig into the specific quirks of how, say, inflation or unemployment is calculated—or how alternative measures (like U-6 unemployment or shadow stats) compare—I’d be glad to help.
Grok 4 answered:
Official economic data from entities like the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), Federal Reserve, or Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) are generally credible but not infallible. Here’s a breakdown of their reliability, focusing purely on methodological and statistical considerations:
Inflation Rate (e.g., Consumer Price Index - CPI):
Strengths: The CPI, produced by the BLS, uses a fixed basket of goods and services, updated periodically, to measure price changes. Data collection is rigorous, involving thousands of price quotes from diverse geographic areas and sectors. Methodologies are transparent, with detailed documentation available.
Limitations: The CPI may not fully capture individual experiences due to regional cost-of-living differences or personal consumption patterns. Substitution bias (consumers shifting to cheaper goods) and quality adjustments (e.g., tech improvements) can skew perceptions of "real" inflation. Hedonic adjustments for quality changes can be subjective but are based on statistical models.
GDP Growth:
Strengths: GDP, reported by the BEA, is calculated using standardized methods (e.g., expenditure or income approaches) aligned with international guidelines (SNA 2008). Data comes from surveys, tax records, and industry reports, with revisions to improve accuracy as more data arrives.
Limitations: Revisions can be significant, especially for initial estimates, as seen in past discrepancies (e.g., Q1 2023 GDP revised from 1.1% to 2.0%). Non-market activities (e.g., household work) and environmental costs are excluded, which may understate or overstate economic "reality." Seasonal adjustments can also introduce noise.
Unemployment Rate:
Strengths: The BLS’s unemployment rate (U-3) comes from the Current Population Survey, a large, randomized sample of households. Definitions follow international standards (ILO). The process is systematic, with clear criteria for who counts as unemployed.
Limitations: The U-3 measure excludes discouraged workers, underemployed individuals, and those marginally attached to the labor force, which the broader U-6 measure captures. For example, in 2023, U-3 was ~3.6%, while U-6 was ~6.7%, showing a gap in "felt" unemployment. Survey response rates have also declined, potentially affecting representativeness.
General Considerations:
Data Integrity: These agencies operate with professional independence, adhering to statistical standards. Manipulation is unlikely due to oversight, peer review, and public scrutiny. However, methodological choices (e.g., weighting, seasonal adjustments) involve judgment calls that can influence outcomes.
Lag and Revisions: Initial releases are often based on incomplete data, leading to revisions. For instance, GDP estimates are revised multiple times over months or years. This can make real-time accuracy lower than final figures.
Scope and Interpretation: No single metric captures the full economy. CPI, GDP, and unemployment reflect specific aspects, not the lived experience of every individual. Structural changes (e.g., gig economy, automation) may not be fully reflected in traditional metrics.
Credibility Assessment: These figures are among the most reliable economic indicators available, grounded in robust, transparent methodologies. However, they are estimates, not perfect mirrors of reality. Assign them high credibility (80-90%) for broad trends, but cross-reference with alternative data (e.g., private indices like the Chapwood Index for inflation or ADP payroll data) and consider their limitations for specific contexts. Always check the latest methodologies on agency websites (e.g., bls.gov, bea.gov) for updates.
I said: Thanks!
It replied: You're welcome! Happy to help with any other questions.
Note: The answers are copied exactly from those given to me by ChatGPT and Grok
Posts
