Showing posts with label Kamala Harris. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Kamala Harris. Show all posts

Wednesday, August 21, 2024

America, remember where you came from and set your eyes on where you need to go back to.

By having him/her promising to eliminate risk weighted bank capital/equity requirements with decreed weights: Federal Government 0% - We the People 100%, elect as president someone willing to disempower the reigning Bureaucracy Autocracy.

In America, with risk weights: Federal Government 0% - We the People 100%, its bank regulators have de facto decreed, that the public sector knows better what to do with public debts than the private sector with its.

America, Land of the Free and the Home of the Brave, understand these regulations imply the public sector knows better what to do with public debts than the private sector with its. Is that not communism/fascism?


So, here some basic questions: 

#RNC If president, does Donald Trump know better what to do with Americas’ debt, for which repayment he’s not responsible for than what, as a business man, he knew (or sometimes did not) with debts he had to repay, even if sometimes only in terms of his reputation?

#DNC If president, does Kamala Harris know better what to do with Americas’ debt for which repayment she’s not responsible for than what, as an ordinary citizen, she thinks she knows with e.g., a mortgage or her credit card debts?

#INC If president, does Robert F. Kennedy know better what to do with Americas’ debt, for which repayment he’s not responsible for than what, as an ordinary citizen, he thinks he knows with e.g., a mortgage or his credit card debts?

#VPs Do JD Vance, Tim Walz or Nicole Shanahan, know better what to do with America's government debt, for which repayment they're not responsible for. than what, as ordinary citizens, they know, with e.g., their mortgages or their credit card debts?

Conclusion: If you've answered "NO!" to all these questions, you know very well, what you must demand your candidate promises to get rid off. 

And, of course, if elected president, hold him very accountable for it. 

Saturday, June 12, 2021

No remittances without representation!

The June 8 news article "In Guatemala, Harris offers stern words on corruption" reported extensively on Vice President Harris's travel to Guatemala, where the United States, by offering financial cooperation, hopes to reduce the flow of illegal migration from Central America and stimulate better behaviors, e.g., less corruption.

Though those financial contributions are indeed important, they are peanuts when compared with the remittances sent home by the migrant workers. The reality is that what the migrant workers from many Central American nations earn abroad is often much more than the gross domestic product of their home countries. The sad reality is that their remittances help to keep in power those ineffective governments that made them immigrate and that keeps them from going home.

If the United States really wants to help, then look to politically empower as much as possible those migrants in their homelands. For instance, should they not have an important direct representation in their respective congresses? No remittances without representation!



No remittances without representation!

 The June 8 news article "In Guatemala, Harris offers stern words on corruption" reported extensively on Vice President Harris's travel to Guatemala, where the United States, by offering financial cooperation, hopes to reduce the flow of illegal migration from Central America and stimulate better behaviors, e.g., less corruption.


Though those financial contributions are indeed important, they are peanuts when compared with the remittances sent home by the migrant workers. The reality is that what the migrant workers from many Central American nations earn abroad is often much more than the gross domestic product of their home countries. The sad reality is that their remittances help to keep in power those ineffective governments that made them immigrate and that keeps them from going home.

If the United States really wants to help, then look to politically empower as much as possible those migrants in their homelands. For instance, should they not have an important direct representation in their respective congresses? No remittances without representation!